Friday, March 27, 2015

Arias and Her Minion

If  you are an Arias fan and supporter,  you don't want to read this.  If you are an Arias hater,  read on.

Arias is much worse of a person than some thought.  "Some" being myself included.  Arias instructed her minion to create a letter to make Travis Alexander look like a monster. The letter will not be posted here because it is filled with inflammatory lies.  Note,  I did not attach "allegedly"  to the fact the letter was initiated by Jodi.    It was such a horrible act that she did not even deserve the benefit of the word "allegedly."   Arias insults the true victims of child sexual abuse by making her false claims in order to serve her selfish desire to make Travis "pay" even more.  For every false claim made,  it reduces the chances a true victim will be believed. In her need for self-gratification,  Arias has shown her true colors.  Escaping responsibility for her actions was the only thing which mattered to her, and she would stoop to any level to do it.

Arias and her supporters seem to not understand that there is a huge difference between "possible"  and "probable."  There isn't much that isn't possible in this life; just because "possible"  exists,  doesn't make it fact.   For example, it's "possible"  that George Barwood,  Sandra Webber, Rob Roman,  and myself could be the same person using multiple profiles.  Is it probable?  No.   It's possible that the person posting comments as Richard Speights after a 7-month absence is really another Jodi loving blogger who was attempting to bait me.  Is it probable?   It's  a hell of a lot more probable than the chances the  letter was  written by Travis Alexander.


Because not many things fall within the realm of the impossible,  guilt is decided upon the definition of what is reasonable.  Hence,  determination of guilt is " beyond a reasonable doubt."   The same standards need to be used when determining the validity of the letter.  Just because "Jodi says so"  doesn't make it a fact.  Jodi said she wasn't there when Travis was killed.  Jodi said it was intruders who did it.  Jodi said after she pulled out of Salinas,  she only had two gas cans on her trip.  All those things Jodi said proved to be false. Jodi was dishonest and a liar long before she ever murdered Travis Alexander, and the admission came right out of her fingertips during the G-Chat and in the pages of her journal.

The letter Jodi instructed to be created can be determined to be false for a number of factors.  First,  the date does not fit the timeline.  In her blatant lie,  she implied she was shocked to the point of vomiting when she walked in on what she claimed to have seen.  She claimed the date was January 21st, 2008.   The letter is dated January 21, 2007.   Jodi's minion either made a mistake or Jodi instructed it to use the date of 07,  forgot,  and later changed her story to a version she thought might work better.   The question is,  why the hell would someone confessing to such a thing even date the letter?  It would be as if they were trying to make an "official" record to be used against them at a later time by someone they could not trust.   The perpetrator would not;  a person trying to frame another for a bad act would.


Secondly,  why would someone who wasn't sure if they could trust a person tell them they were guilty of the felony act of sexual abuse against a child?   Travis knew Jodi was a liar;  she lied to him several times,  and she continued to lie to him. Jodi stated that Travis had a hard time trusting her and wrote about it in her journal.  The letter Jodi instructed to be written implied a lack of trust as well:


If Travis could not trust Jodi,  why the hell would he had volunteered the information something far worse than what she claimed she saw happened?  If he were a pedophile,  he wouldn't.  It's not in the realm of reason.  The nature of a pedophile is to protect their secret at all costs. They do not volunteer information, especially that which could end them up in jail,  unless they are backed in a corner and have no way out.  Per the lie Jodi told,  she only caught him with a picture.

 If we are to believe Jodi's story that the letter was real,  which no one with common sense would, Travis would have had to be a complete fool.  He would have had to be  thinking "I know you don't know,  you've given me countless examples not to trust you, but let me tell you my deepest darkest secret anyways.  I did more than what you saw." And,  if Travis was such a fool,  how the hell could he have hidden the abuse Jodi claimed?  It's not in the realm of reason.  As JJ would say "If it doesn't make sense to your common sense,  it's usually not true."


The third reason the letter can be determined to be complete bullshit is the fact the letter was written in the first place and ended up with Jodi.  Per Jodi's elaborate tale,  Travis did not come into contact with her until later that night, and he explained everything in person.  So how did Jodi get the letter then?  Why would he risk giving it to her if they were face to face and he could tell her what he needed to explain without the risk of creating a permanent record?  Given the content,  why would he have left the letter on Jodi's door step where anyone could have read it?   Jodi had been bold enough to invade his privacy in the past; it meant the same thing might have happened with the roommate's invading Jodi's privacy. Writing the letter just does not make sense when Jodi was minutes away; it's most likely why she instructed her minion to date it 2007 in the first place.  If the letter were permitted into evidence,  the date would have come into question. Jodi would have only lied and claimed Travis made a mistake on the date.

The fifth reason the letter should not be believed is that it did not even match the lies Jodi told.  Jodi implied that Travis never touched a child;  to prevent it from happening  he made a 'deal' with her not to stay the night at anyone's house who had children.  The letter claimed he did hurt a child.  The letter also implied that Travis had "toys" which Jodi never saw,  and he got rid of them.  However,  in her lies on the stand, Jodi claimed she saw the toys one day, and they used them for sex.


 The fourth reason the letter can be determined to be the act of a hateful woman are the obvious signs of forgery.  It was a cut and paste document created by multiple sources.


"Frustrations"  is a combination of multiple words,  the "T" coming form a darker source.

The word "THE"  is smaller because it was cut from an entry in which Travis was writing smaller.


For the most part,  the period placement does not  appear to match Travis' usual habit of writing.    Travis placed his period almost immediately after the last word.  There was the occasional floating period, but for the most part it appeared almost immediately after.   One would have to use multiple documents to account for the amount of times it occurred in Jodi's fake letter.




Jodi had Travis' journal and instructed her minion to use it to create the letters. Shortly before Jodi left Mesa, Travis' journal came up missing. He eventually believed Jodi took it.  Jodi knew things about his personal life and time with Lisa Andrews that she should not have.  Jodi lied and stated it was a Michelle K who told her,  but Travis saw right through her lie.   The day after he called Jodi out for lying,  he wrote in his journal a passage which indicated he was suspicious Jodi stole his old one.

"I wouldn't be surprised if my journal were stolen and most my time with Lisa was in there."  

During the G-Chat fight, Travis finally confronted Jodi about his belief she took his journal.  The fact she knew things about his time with Lisa validated his suspicions.  Of course Jodi denied it;  she was a liar.   Jodi had his journal and instructed her minion to use pages from it to create the letters to help her escape responsibility and justice for her crime.

Jodi used his journal just like I used the copy of the family letter to create the following Jodi "confession"  note.  Now,  just imagine what I could have done if I had an original copy that was not smudged up.......


Should my copy of a "confession"  letter be believed?  I guess her supporters would say "no." But why not?  It's in her writing, after all....... 




Travis' written words from other sources were rearranged in order to give them a different meaning.  Mike LeBlanc has demonstrated how simple it is to rearrange something someone has written in order to change the context:

Jodi's original statement in a letter to Ryan:



Changing the context of it:








The fifth reason Jodi's letter should not be believed is the same reason my copy of Jodi's 'confession' should not be believed:  It is only a copy.   If the letter was real,  why the hell would Jodi make a copy,  keep it,  and allow the originals to be destroyed?   And,  it wasn't just one original destroyed,  Jodi claimed all her original letters were destroyed.  It's an unreasonable statement to believe.   If the letter were real,  keeping the original could have meant the difference between life and death for Jodi;  Or,  at least had granted her freedom one day.   The fact that Jodi was not even willing to state who she got the letter from is a big clue that they were not real.    If the letters were real,  telling the court who gave them to her could only have helped her.  If the letters were fake,  telling the court could have ended up landing her co-conspirator in jail.
Each time I look at the fake letter,  another sign it was a forgery pops out at me.   The last was the placement of the periods.   The fake letter has them placed too far apart.  Travis rarely did that.  In order to provide as many examples as is shown in the letter,  multiple different samples of his writings would have to be used.

The sixth reason the Jodi's letter can be determined to be fake: The spacing in between the words is not indicative of Travis' writing.  Apparently,  as noted in his writing,  Travis did not believe in placing a sufficient space between his words;   sometimes it appeared as if he was writing one long word which should have been four or five.


The space between words in Jodi's fake letter appear to be further apart than Travis' habit of writing.  Sometimes he placed larger spaces.  However, usually his words were crowded together:


A blow up of the letter really shows the difference when compared with a sample of Travis' writing.



Jodi's supporters will always choose to believe what they want to believe no matter how much it goes against common sense.    When they use the obvious fake letters to label Travis a pedophile,  they are just as guilty as she is in causing damage in the fight against child sexual abuse.   With every false claim presented,  it increases doubt when the real ones come out.  No child should ever have to go through facing doubt when they come out,  but it happens because of people like Jodi making her false claims.  Whoever helped her make those letters should take a look at themselves and realize what their actions say: "The real victims don't matter as long as the lie can help Jodi out." 





63 comments:

  1. This is excellent! Great work! In our book we talked about Jodi/someone making them from his journals, but you actually showed it! Thank you!!!!! Great article!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I want to say I am sorry for your loss and I am sorry for the harassment your family have been subject to by certain people on the internet. It's obvious that you loved Travis very much, and so did his family. Anyone who has tried to belittle that is demonstrating what kind of person they are and it's not the kind of person who is a positive part of society.

      I was one of the people who first thought it was not a good idea to publish the letters - my fear was her supporters using it to degrade him more. However, the letter had a profound effect on me: It took away any hope that there was a piece of humanity living within Jodi Arias. I now believe posting the letter was the right thing because it really demonstrated her lies and the extent she would go to in order to hurt Travis even more. The letter shows what a monster she really is.

      Delete
    2. Very good insight, however if the claims of these letters are from court motions back in 2010...I think that eliminates the MINIONS. To this date I've really only counted a handful. And remember this is all before the media spectacle. So unless MM or DB had something to do with it then I say it was JA that did these letters. And I have a specific theory I've put together. I'd love to run it by Sky before I post anywhere.

      Back to this crappy letter. We know that Jodi had Travis's first handwritten chapter(s) of his book to type up, she wanted that recognition for this. So she had access to handwriting and lots of it.
      We also know JA likes to trace things, so I believe some of the words and parts of entire sentences were traced. If you look at the size of some words and phrases are smaller or bigger than the rest of the line. It's very slight, but if you look at some words....it's almost a carbon copy of the same word elsewhere (no one writes a word exactly the same (size, space, angle) every time.
      There is also a....sense of flow or better writing, in the most damming sentences in the writing itself....I hate to say it but Travis had chicken scratch with awkwardly written words (almost childlike). I can see that in parts of the letter in certain phrases. So when I see what you put together I feel validated. Whew...I didn't spend the last three days in vain.

      Delete
    3. Thank you, Debbie. We didn't want them out there either for obvious reasons- what it says about Travis, our son's name etc. But, after they were released, I was glad they were out there because they really do show who Jodi is and what she is capable of. We had decided to include them in our book before they were released (after much going back and forth about it) so that there was a record of it. We know JA supporters had them because they were quoting things from this letter and my email to Nurmi during the first trial. The truth had to be told because they would have used them against Travis eventually.And thanks to you there is more than one. It blows me away that Jodi supporters can completely ignore that this was her original story, but it's nothing like what she said on the stand. I personally don't think it was Darryl Brewer. I agree with Debbie that they were computer generated. I wouldn't think JA would have access to a scanner and computer. Travis accused Jodi of stealing his journals, so I am guessing they were used along with other writings to create the letter. There is no original- only the digital copy which supports Debbie's theory that they were done outside of jail. The message in the magazine was to Matt. It's the only thing that makes sense. He was speaking to the attorneys around that time and was scheduled to testify. He claimed to have seen the original of this letter. Is that where he "f'd up" because there "were no originals?" We will probably never know. Debbie, is there a way I can PM you?

      Delete
    4. Yes, of course PM me. Do u want to do it thru Facebook? I am thinking it's the best way. I don't want to post the contact info here for obvious reasons .... There is already a troll posing on here as someone else.... I knew it early on, hence the message at the beginning of the article. The troll gave himself away. Lol... He used a cultural aspect specific to the UK and portions of Canada... IE "The High Sheriff".... A High Sheriff in the UK is very different than our " sheriffs" in the States.

      It really is quite fascinating the extent many of the Jodi supporters go to to harass just because a person posts the truth about her that demonstrates her horrid lying character. I have a strong suspicion as to who the imposter troll is. But not 100% positive so I will not post the name here. It has to do with his writing style --- "Writing style" was another reason why I could tell the 2010 letter was forged.
      I dunno if you saw the additional signs of forgery I added to the article. I noticed the letter had a lot of "floating periods" which isn't indicative of Travis' style in the examples on Karas' website.
      Something I believe is a very obvious tell is the spacing. No insult meant to Travis, but his written word spacing was just awful... He liked to run his words together, didn't he?.. Lol, it was quite aggravating to me when I read the excerpts on Karas' page. The content was bery good but I found myself thinking "spaces please, my eyes are crossing." The fake letter was appropriaty spaced. Even tho I am only an amatuer i have a keen eye for what doesn't match. Guess it was from years in my childhood reading "highlights".... " find the differences" was one of my favorites.
      Anyhow, if you want to PM me via FB, I will post the link to my profile when back home. And, to any of the trolls watching, I will be able to determine the difference between Sky's real profile and your fake one... Try as u want but my FB info will stay locked from u. Not meaning to sound arrogant, but yes, I am that good.

      Delete
  2. Jodi should have got death, maybe she will in Perryville

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ginger, I don't believe in the DP but after the letter, a part of me really wishes Jodi got it. I understand the need for any criminal to lie to save their own skin, but the pedophilia lies goes beyond that. There was a number of things Jodi could have used to lie about, but she chose to use the one that was the most heinous in nature. It demonstrates her purpose was not to save her own skin, but to continue to try to attack her victim. It demonstrated the extreme hate and lack of remorse she had for him. Without remorse, there is no hope for rehabilitation: Legally speaking, the DP was warranted in her case.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    3. Why would Skye Hughes need to validate ANYTHING to Sandy Webber? Deleting her question was a public service, Deb. Thank you for that!

      Delete
    4. I am for free speech but I will not tolerate harassment of family of the victim on my blog. The Hughes were close enough to Travis that they can be considered victims.

      Delete
    5. I missed the question, but thank you, Debbie.

      Delete
  3. Wow, thank you for posting and taking the time do do this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Outstanding analysis.Even though I knew they would be fake , now I know for sure they are through reasoning and facts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was driven to write it because it really made me angry when I saw the letters, saw how fake they were, and then saw her supporters claim they were real because the "handwriting matched." I made the "Jodi confession" letter to make a point; it's very easy to cut,paste, and copy to create a fraud.
      The statements in the letters don't even match what she said on the stand; and it's beyond belief that anyone would confess such a crime to someone they did not trust when there was no reason to. The fact those who believe the letter can't see that shows just how blinded they are.

      Delete
  5. That was awesome! Everytime I see or hear that POS's name I feel sick to my stomach. Glad to see her wrongdoings exposed. Justice will prevail once she gets to Perryville....they will put an end to her once and for all! Justice 4 Travis!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Another great Blog post, I was able to do the same thing with some of Jodi's letters, very easy to do, I posted them on a couple of FB groups.

    You may have seen them.

    Mike

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have, and yours are so much better than mine. I would love to include them in the article if it is OK with you (giving you credit of course)

      Delete
  7. Deb, that is just a very brilliant analysis... It should be required reading by supporters of Arais but nah... they would not believe it anyway..... I appreciate the thought you put into this piece. It was great!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nice work. This evidence only furher advances her psychopathy and narcissistic personality. I find it extremely entertaining on how JA and the supporters blame everyone in this case but JA. ( the judge,prosecution,LE ,the ME, jury, victim and family, friends, the roomates, hell, I'm shocked Napolein hasn't been blamed yet)What I find appalling is the supporters ( esp. , " The Jodi Arias is innocent site), use their persuasive writing style to make it appear TA is the vile abuser, (SMH) , they prey on the vulnerable,naive,and uneducated people to "con" money out of them but ,"you are what you allow. I enjoy you puting these lunatic supporters in their place with all the common sense and evidence. Ja is a classic example of how a psychopath masters the art of manipulatiion and can weave people into her "psychopathy".

    ReplyDelete
  9. Question for anyone brave enough to delve into Arias' mind? "If the letter were real, keeping the original could have meant the difference between life and death for Jodi; Or, at least had granted her freedom one day." → I 100% believe the letter was a forgery but I’m having trouble understanding this statement. She was clearly trying to destroy his reputation by claiming he was a pedophile so was her thinking because a "pedophile" is so despised no one would blame her for killing one!!

    Other than that, I deeply believe the entire “pedophile” seed was either directly or indirectly planted by Nurmi (who defends pedophiles in his practice)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry but have disagree with you. These letters have nothing to do with a premeditated murder whatsoever. A confession outlined in the "letter" do not change the facts of the case nor do they help her as far as any self defense argument. He could have been the poster boy for pedophilia and unless you believe that warrants being murdered in a horrific manner, the confession is useless except to further victimize him and his family.

      Delete
  10. Good stuff yet again. I'll be sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again, the links I have provided indicate the MOS on the posted DD214 is not the MOS of a soldier who was a Special Forces medic. Its the truth and it can easily be researched by anyone who wants. In fact, I wholeheartedly encourage anyone and everyone to verify what the MOS on the posted DD214 indicates. It really is easy to find out.
      They will discover it is not the MOS of a SF medic. It is the MOS of a soldier who failed to reach the rank of sergeant in his or her 7 years... Usually it only takes 4.2 years... Someone who was SF and won the EMFB should be able to do it in those 4. So, the Stolen Valor article stays.... Guess I need to stop procrastinating and send for the public military information for the owner of the DD 214. Got to get it ready for that "high sheriff" giving out legal advice .... Lol...

      Delete
    2. the DD214 lacks the CMF (career management field)code which is used to indicate a person was in Special Forces at some time during their enlistment. The CMF code is 18D, not 91A (now it's 68W)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_occupation_code
      First three characters: The MOS (military occupational specialty). The first two characters are always numbers, the third character is always a letter. The two-digit number is usually (but not always) synonymous with the Career Management Field (CMF)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_occupation_code
      The field code (CMF)"18" was created for US Army Special Forces
      18A was for Special Forces officers.....18X was for Special Forces candidates who had not yet passed the "Q" course

      http://usmilitary.about.com/od/enlistedjobs/a/enlmos.htm
      18D SPECIAL FORCES MEDICAL SERGEANT

      http://www.military1.com/all/article/318806-army-mos-codes
      18D Special Operations Medical Sergeant

      http://www.army-portal.com/jobs/special-forces/index.html
      18D—Special Forces Medical Sergeant

      http://army.com/info/mos/SpecialForces
      Special Forces Medical Sergeant 18D Employs conventional and unconventional warfare tactics and techniques in providing medical care and treatment.

      http://www.apd.army.mil/Home/Links/PDFFiles/MOSBook.pdf

      http://www.usarec.army.mil/hq/apa/download/CMF_MOS_Chart.pdf
      CMF (career management field): 18 = Title: Special Forces.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_careers#Special_Forces_Branch_.28SF.29
      18 D Special Forces Medical Sergeant

      http://www.nationalguard.com/special-forces-qualification-course
      Read:18D Medical Sergeant Course (14 weeks [SOCM - 36 weeks])

      The MOS listed on the DD214 was NOT a CMF code for a SF medic (18D) The code listed, 91A10, was the code used for a medical corpsman. It changed to 68W in October, 2006.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68W


      https://books.google.com/books?id=qh5lffww-KsC&pg=PA733&lpg=PA733&dq=MOS+91A10&source=bl&ots=jCC_H8uvRs&sig=5VIT1j34RYG4gQyuiS4YLLZOHew&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pSgpVZq_AYGwggSAjoGgBw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=MOS%2091A10&f=false
      (Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military...) "In the Army the MOS for combat medics was 91A10 for those of rank E-4 and below."

      http://www.militaryfactory.com/ranks/army_ranks.asp
      E1 - PVT
      E2 - Private 2
      E3 - Private first class
      E4 - SPC specialist or Corporal
      E5 - Sergeant

      "91A10 7 years and 1 month" is a person who was NOT in the Special Forces (SF's CMF is not 91, it is 18) and they did NOT reach the rank of sergeant during their 7 years of enlistment.

      http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/armypromotions/a/armypromotions_5.htm
      So, how long does it take to get promoted in the Army? Remember, it's dependent on the particular MOS (job) and how many vacancies (due to separations and retirements) there are in that job. On average, however, one can expect to be promoted with the following time-in-service (2001 statistics):
      Sergeant (E-5) - 4.2 years

      I have provided a lot of links which supports my statement that the MOS on the posted DD214 is NOT for a Special Forces Medic. The links also support my statement the MOS on the DD214 indicates the owner could not reach the rank of Sergeant in 7 years and one month when the usual time needed is only 4.2.

      Where is your proof I am wrong? I guess each time you allege I am wrong, I will have to repost the links which show I am not. The posted DD214 does not indicate the owner made it past a corporal during the 7 year enlistment and they were not in SF.

      Delete
    3. I suspect that you will do as you have done when faced with the other comments you could not defend: Tuck tail and run while pretending you did not see. Some term that "Pris Cross."

      IE "My website is still up and running, unaltered" -- if unaltered, why did the statement "I am a second generation Green Beret disappear after the Stolen Valor article appeared? Why was the article which included the statement " (I was) a Special Forces Trained medic" removed from the website?

      Why does the MOS (as supported by the multiple links I provided) indicate the owner failed to reach the rank of Sergeant in 7 years when the average was only 4?

      Why does the MOS indicate the owner was a medical corpsman (91A) and not a Special Forces Medic (18D)?

      How does the owner explain the time discrepancy? Enlisted in 1978, served 7 years (1985), went to a community college, went to a university, obtained a degree, and graduated in 1985 (managed to get a four year degree in the same year the owner left the service).

      How was the owner a good enough solider that he earned the EFMB but a bad enough soldier that he could not reach rank of sergeant when given almost twice the amount of time required?

      Delete
    4. Oh BTW, "The High Sheriff" is Brit thing, not an American position, silly.... There is no one called the High Sheriff in the States. Only law enforcement officers call "Sheriffs" and their role is to keep the peace, like a police officer.
      Guess you should have kept with the first comment you posted and deleted because you left that tidbit out. In the end, imposters always give themselves away.

      Delete
    5. LOL The High Sheriff. Oh my! Hilarious how u exposed yourself as being in the UK. Why not call a waaaaaaaaaaaambulance while you're at it. They can take you to your nearest psycho ward.

      Delete
    6. Spazzy Speight's imposter. You're a fraud, a liar, a creeper, a moron who can't sue for shite. You committed fraud. Call the High Sheriff we don't have here in the US mental midget. How can one sue when they are an imposter? Good luck with your ignorant to our laws here. Should we contact Scotland Yard for you imposter pig in the UK? Maybe Rat Rob Roman can help you with that? Seeing he is an imposter too.

      Delete
    7. Speaking of uneducated, illiterate, mentally stunted, knuckle-dragging troglodyte which is exactly what the imposter is. Where is that cease & desist order from a High Sheriff we don't have here in the US? Doh! Keep making an ass out of yourself. It's highly entertaining. Oh and FYI, we all know you've been here many times. U did not use that imposter name of course. You stupid or what? You're beyond transparent u jealous "all talk no action" troll.

      Delete
    8. So this imaginary High Sheriff you could not have spoken to since you have no idea where Ohio is actually. How does one sue an fraud & imposter for defemation? Not going to happen as we know you never keep your word. Here is how it actually does work in the US where you would have to get off your lazy troll azz and be there in person before & during the case. Thanks for proving yet again what an ignorant putz you are who is no match for us woman nor any others.

      Read it and weep trolly troll:

      http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/personal-injury/filing-civil-lawsuit-defamation-expect.html

      Delete
    9. The imposter would never pass this part of the case that is a major requirement. It's call a deposition. Say it again folks! DEPOSITION!

      Depositions
      Then, depositions will probably occur. A deposition is an interview under oath during which the attorney for the other party asks you questions. This is an opportunity for him or her to size you up and determine what kind of witness you will be at trial, how a jury might perceive you, and how strong your claims are. Your lawyer will help you prepare. Usually the two opposing parties in a case are deposed, but sometimes other witnesses may be questioned as well, such as doctors, friends or relatives who have knowledge about your case.

      Delete
    10. The author of the original post has decided for some unknown reason to delete his comment. However, whenever someone posts, the comment is emailed to me at the time they post. Thus, I will share the original comment written. Copied and pasted from my email:

      Richard Speights
      Apr 10 (12 days ago)

      to me


      Richard Speights has left a new comment on your post "Arias and Her Minion":

      You always find a way to go too far, Maran. I have never written a word about the above subject, the Alexander's pedophile confession letter, yet you find a way to connect my name to the same. Nonetheless, you suggest someone else is writing comments in my name. I am Richard Speights, and I wrote the comments you alluded. No one else is writing comments under your idiotic blogs in my name.

      You accused me of fraud in your a blog, Prevent Stolen Valor, a piece populated almost exclusively with erroneous information. You don’t know a think about the military, and your research is far from adequate. More than inadequate, you supplied your reader with false information concerning military protocols and procedures. Of course, you didn’t know it was false, because you are with every word proving yourself the stupidest person on the planet.

      Nonetheless, something good has come from that blog. I contacted the High Sheriff in your county about your defamations, and his department informed me I can sue you from my location—I do not have to travel to Toledo, Ohio. Isn’t that great!

      Once again, as I have commented in your other blog: It’s been about ten months since you accused me to the FBI of Stolen Valor, and I have heard not a peep from them. I’ve not heard a word from any of the agencies to which you have complained. I’ve heard not a word from anyone.

      They have not contacted me, because I did not commit fraud; I did not lie. You, on the other hand, have defamed me through your grammatically inept English and inadequate research. Research if good, but the researcher must have at least some intelligence and cognitive ability to research well. You are neither intelligent nor cognitively able. You gather information like one who does not know the difference between eatable and poisonous wanders through the woods collecting mushrooms to sell to restaurants. Your blogs are full if poisonous information, skewing through and killing truth.

      Before a judge forces you to cease and desist, withdraw your blogs concerning me and write a retraction and an apology. Do so before it is too late. You have left yourself open and are leaving yourself open to litigation. Stop defaming me you uneducated, illiterate, mentally stunted, knuckle-dragging troglodyte.




      Posted by Richard Speights to Jodi Arias Trial Truth at April 10, 2015 at 12:20 PM

      Delete
    11. Oh my ... you did hit a nerve, Deborah.

      Speights threatens legal action, but he will never follow through. Why? His real DD214 would be presented in court and his lies will again be verified.

      Delete
  12. So lets get this straight. The fraud who claimed to have been in the military in the US (made it up) and has no idea we don't have High Sheriff's here? Doh! Sheriff's of any kind don't handle law suits anywhere in the world. What a knuckle dragging ignorant in the UK you are. U tripped up more than a few times as frauds always do. This is just like some crazy chick living with her mother up in Canada claiming she's a forensic pathologist Miss Pajamagirl.

    I always wonder why the imposter was always lying their fugly face off made several laughable threats to sue yet never did? Doh! They don't even live in the US, they were never in the military and certainly was never trained as a military doctor. What a bunch of hooey.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Step away from the crack imposter.

    What is a High Sheriff?

    The Office of High Sheriff is an independent non-political Royal appointment for a single year. The origins of the Office date back to Saxon times, when the ‘Shire Reeve’ was responsible to the king for the maintenance of law and order within the shire, or county, and for the collection and return of taxes due to the Crown. Today, there are 55 High Sheriffs serving the counties of England and Wales each year.

    Whilst the duties of the role have evolved over time, supporting the Crown and the judiciary remain central elements of the role today. In addition, High Sheriffs actively lend support and encouragement to crime prevention agencies, the emergency services and to the voluntary sector. In recent years High Sheriffs in many parts of England and Wales have been particularly active in encouraging crime reduction initiatives, especially amongst young people. Many High Sheriffs also assist Community Foundations and local charities working with vulnerable and other people both in endorsing and helping to raise the profile of their valuable work. The High Sheriff Association adopted DebtCred and Crimebeat in recent years in response to specific areas of need.

    High Sheriffs receive no remuneration and no part of the expense of a High Sheriff’s year falls on the public purse.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've spoken to the real Richard Speights. You Mr R fraud sound nothing like him no matter how desperately you try. Also, your UK timing gave yourself away as you alone show the depth of your ignorance..not "dept". That would mean "department". You'll never get that egg off your fraud face fool.

      Delete
    2. Clearly you lack comprehension skills while you did not read the whole article honoring a really loved Sheriff. "The high sheriff" here was clearly made in gest. What a bone head u are. So was that the guy you called? lol You liar. Oh and by the way, great job exposing yourself as a stalker trying to get Deborah's info. Man, oh man, you keep steeping in your own shit. It's hilarious.

      Delete
    3. I am under the impression that when replies are posted to a comment, a notice gets sent to the email of the OP. I mistakenly placed my reply in another post, but it was meant to be placed here. Refer to the post below so you will understand where you are WRONG....

      Out of curiosity, I contacted the Sheriff's association of New Hampshire. I have never heard anyone call the sheriff of any county a "high sheriff" even once. However, I don't live in the New England state New Hampshire. I considered that maybe since they are a New England state they may use "high sheriff" to describe their sheriffs....

      NOPE....

      https://www.facebook.com/pages/NH-Sheriffs-Association/165809840145208
      NH Sheriff's Association "Usually folks just call them Sheriff"

      (I posted the link so anyone who wishes to also PM the sherrif's association can).

      Delete
    4. I have an idea for you.... You should contact the real Richard Speights and tell him you have been impersonating him. Then ask him to back you up on his Facebook page..... But when you do it let him know you portrayed him as a person who lies ("My website is unaltered")..... a person who is ignorant to what "jurisdiction" means ("They told me I didn't have to travel to your state to sue you)..... and one who is grammatically inept. "Isn't that great!"

      Delete
    5. The author of the comment decided to erase the comment. However, whenever a person posts, the comment is always emailed to me. I have decided to copy and paste the orignal comment:

      Richard Speights
      Apr 12 (10 days ago)

      to me


      Richard Speights has left a new comment on your post "Arias and Her Minion":

      http://www.toledonewsnow.com/story/24158288/crisp-co-honors-sheriff-with-special-day

      "He's been our sheriff. He's the high sheriff here. He's a great friend, great leader and he's also serve the state," said Monica Simmons.

      High sheriff
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      A high sheriff is a ceremonial officer for each shrieval county of England and Wales and Northern Ireland or the chief sheriff of a number of paid sheriffs in U.S. states who outranks and commands the others in their court-related functions.

      In case you don't know it, Maran. Your sheriff is the High Sheriff of your county.

      Keep writing, girls. Show the world the dept of your ignorance.



      Posted by Richard Speights to Jodi Arias Trial Truth at April 11, 2015 at 10:25 PM Reply Forward

      Delete
    6. Always fun to stay one step a head of a fraud. LMAO

      Delete
  15. Oh Mr. R. Man person, did you perhaps read the entire article? Or, maybe it's because you don't live here that you don't understand when "Toledo News Now" begins a story w/ "Cordelle Ga" they are talking about Georgia, not Ohio.

    Your desperate attempt to keep up your Charade has failed, R. In the US there is only ONE Sheriff per county. Those who serve under him or her are called "deputies.". Let's say it together: DEP-U-TIES.

    If you read the entire Wikipedia reference, you would have read:
    "The position of high sheriff in the United States generally denotes the superior sheriff in a STATE (not county), or the head of a STATE-wide (not county) Sheriff's office. Such positions exist in Rhode Island ( a State) and Hawaii (another State). In New Hampshire (yet another STATE), the ten High Sheriff's are the senior law enforcement officers of each county. That is only 12 Sherrif called High Sheriff out of 3144 counties.. ... So the High Sherrif is NOT an US thing.

    Even though Wikipedia uses the term High Sherrif for the head STATE (not county) Sherrif, those of us who live here understand it's not a common term. You forgot to use multiple sources ..... Maybe this webpage will help you understand.

    Www.legal genealogist.com/blog/2012/06/07the-high-sheriff/

    " The term high sheriff came to the colonies with the English common law and was widely used in EARLY America. ..... The term did not appear in statutes until 1787 and was rarely used in statutory references after that ."

    The term was once used traditionally (not officially)
    To identify a county sheriff.... But for the majority of the States, the traditional use died out more than 30 years ago... Its been 100 years for Ohio (1911) and 34 years for Loisianna

    The term was last used in the 19th century in Ca. (1864), DE (1811), IL (1875), ME(1847), MD (1880), MI(1849), MO(1847), WV (1899). In the 20th century: AL (1988), GA (1994), KY (1951), LS(1981), MA (2004), MS (1970), NJ (1918) NC (1987), OK (1915), PA (1931), SC (1912), TN (1978), Texas (1994) VT (1979) and VA (1934).

    Out of the 50 US states and 3,144 US counties, a very small handful use the colonial term high sheriff to identify a Sherrif. Montana, Lousianna, and Ohio are NOT in the list. RI has a STATE (not county) high sheriff and so does Hawaii. The county sheriff's in NH are called high Sherrif too. So, out of 3144 counties, only 12 High Sherrif positions exist. (13 if one considers the unofficial use of it in Fulton Co Ga. Fulton county is 2 hours away from the county noted in R. Man's article.)

    In case you don't know it, traditionally referring to a sheriff in Ohio as a High Sheriff died out over a100 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Step away from the crack imposter.

    What is a High Sheriff?

    The Office of High Sheriff is an independent non-political Royal appointment for a single year. The origins of the Office date back to Saxon times, when the ‘Shire Reeve’ was responsible to the king for the maintenance of law and order within the shire, or county, and for the collection and return of taxes due to the Crown. Today, there are 55 High Sheriffs serving the counties of England and Wales each year.

    Whilst the duties of the role have evolved over time, supporting the Crown and the judiciary remain central elements of the role today. In addition, High Sheriffs actively lend support and encouragement to crime prevention agencies, the emergency services and to the voluntary sector. In recent years High Sheriffs in many parts of England and Wales have been particularly active in encouraging crime reduction initiatives, especially amongst young people. Many High Sheriffs also assist Community Foundations and local charities working with vulnerable and other people both in endorsing and helping to raise the profile of their valuable work. The High Sheriff Association adopted DebtCred and Crimebeat in recent years in response to specific areas of need.

    High Sheriffs receive no remuneration and no part of the expense of a High Sheriff’s year falls on the public purse.

    ReplyDelete
  17. In your desperation imposter. You've made yet another fool of yourself all the way from the UK. Can't you read ignorant? Guess not. Good luck not suing anyone which you've been claiming to do for over a yr now. What's the matter piss poor joke? You can't afford a lawyer? Seems not all talk no action windbag. You are a liar & total fraud. You lie in your own waste. You made my morning laughing at you.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Mr. R's tiny ball sack was just squeezed a little tighter. So much fun! Mr. R, selective reading much? The basis of the article went right over your fraud head. Classic! Your deception game is over. Dumbazz bloke.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Everyone knows wikipedia can be changed so the info is not accurate. Oh accept for ignorant Mr R Fraud man. I posted the accurate description. You ignored it on purpose. How suits are handled in every state. You should look that up ignorant one.

    Here is a tip for free! In Ohio, civil complaints up to $3,000 can be handled in small claim courts. For lawsuits seeking more than $3,000 in damages, lawsuits are filed in regular municipal court. Small claims court is much simpler and designed for people to represent themselves. However, if you are suing for more than $3,000 and have to file in municipal court, contact an attorney or Legal Aid in your area as the steps are far more complicated

    Read more : http://www.ehow.com/how_8471833_file-civil-lawsuit-ohio.html

    So in short, you are full of it fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Mr R Fraud needs a map of the US. Georgia is no where near Ohio. Zoom over your ignorant head. Oh and here is another rule here in the US that you have zero concept of grasping. "All you say and do can be used against you in the court of law". That would include your threats and highly entertaining hissy fits. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would know this.

    ReplyDelete
  23. How does one mix up a town in Georgia with a town in Ohio? Someone extremely stupid and is not in the US. It is 935 miles from Toledo, George to Toledo, Ohio. Two different states you doofas.

    ReplyDelete
  24. As suspected, Mr R imposter never came back yesterday as his major screw up blew up in his fraud face. BAM! Moron!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Find this curious since it was I who found the voice over material Speights has never, ever been hired as. Low and behold he puts it on his lie filled site. Read his bio which makes no mention of being in the military.

    http://www.herrspeightsventures.com/Herr_Voice_Over.php

    ReplyDelete
  26. He also conned people out of money on ebay. There was no computer glitch he bold faced lied about. As we tracked the sale of McDonald's Rubiks cubes. There were only customer complaints that seller took $$ and did not provide the cubes. Many attempts to reach the sell went unanswered. Ebay & PayPal are no dummies banned Speights from further fraud. We contacted paypal and there was no glitch (dummy he is called it "hitch) and if you can't get into your acct they are more than willing to help you get in. So what did the busted scammer do? He bold faced lied in this entry as he knew he was caught. Sure, sure..NOT! It's paypal's fault. Bull crap. There is no "we" they always seem to mention lately that had to pull the sale. EBay banned your scamming azz. FACT!

    http://www.herrspeightsventures.com/McDonald_s_Rubik_s_Cubes.php

    Occasionally things go wrong. Sometimes a wrong can be righted, but sometimes it cannot.

    A computer glitch caused our browser to dump all its saved passwords. As we reentered the PayPal password, their system rejected it. We attempted to create a new password, but every attempt has failed.

    At this point, we have no access to our PayPal account. Furthermore, we cannot make a career out of solving PayPal’s problem, so we must leave them for a while.

    Without the ability to access the funds in their system, we must suspend all Ebay sales until we find a solution to the problem.

    Although we have no control over PayPal and the hitch in their program, we apologize for the inconvenience.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So muffin, I guess you didn't like me reposting your comments after you erased them? Or was it the truth I shared about the ad hominem attacks? Oh well. I guess "you just can't handle the truth." By the way, how come you didn't do that one simple thing you had to do to "prove" your identity. I mean, Speights may still do it if you ask him nicely to post a message on his Facebook or Webpage to claim his identity wasn't being stolen. But of course, you would have to forewarn him about how you made him look (as shared in my first message to you) and then add "obsessive" and "harassment" to the list. I mean, what else does one call 29 of the same messages in 9 minutes?

      Delete
    2. Boy, your high sheriff is real slow aren't they? You've been making threats to sue for 2 or more yrs now. What are you waiting for fraud?

      Delete
  28. LMAO This impostor is one ignorant bafoon. What part of "all comments go right into Deborah's e-mail box" did you not get? All 29 of them that u thought you could erase. Kiss your imaginary lawsuit goodbye filthy foreigner.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The female fraud rears her foolish head, but not here because she's such a coward. On Krispy Kareem's blog. She thick in the head or what? What part of we don't have nor use a high sheriff to sue people here in the US doesn't this wacked out wench not get? Due to their ignorance at all times. I trace this flunatic (fraud + lunatic) back to the Examiner. Their sue happy & honey give them away every time. Cray, Cray in Canada for sure.

    Richard Speights
    Sky, I wasn't able to record all my warnings of defamation. Could you send me that list of "SSs". I could sure use them. Thanks. (Honey, all American sheriffs are considered high sheriffs. Only a few keep the title proper, but the sheriff is the chief law officer in his or her county, therefore the high sheriff). You are making noise, but you are not making sense.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.